English GM David Howell shared his thoughts on one-on-one matches in chess. Howell says such matches have become less common, and notes their distinctive old-fashioned atmosphere.

David Howell

David Howell

English GM, commentator

“There is something wonderfully old-fashioned about a serious Classical one-on-one chess match.

In an era where so much effort goes into making chess faster, more spectacular, and more appealing to spectators, it is especially pleasing to see two players simply sit down for a proper match. No gimmicks, no attempts to reinvent the game. Just Classical chess: one long game per day, with deep preparation, total concentration, and detailed post-game analysis.

This was once the norm. Matches were an integral part of chess life — not only at the highest level, but also for ambitious players seeking to test themselves and learn.

Today they have become much rarer. The calendar is dominated by large Open tournaments, perhaps because of the huge number of talented chess players emerging on the scene.

Recently there was a match between Felix Blohberger and David Navara in Vienna. However, the score was not the main thing. What stood out most was the spirit of the event. It felt as if it came from an earlier chess era: two players in suits and ties, taking the game seriously, analysing positions deeply, and showing respect for the chessboard.

This is chess as it should be.”

In 2026, several one-on-one matches took place between Grandmasters and content creators. Among them were Magnus Carlsen vs Hikaru Nakamura, Nakamura vs Awonder Liang, Liang vs Hans Niemann, Niemann vs Ian Nepomniachtchi, Levy Rozman vs Julien Song, and Yagiz Kaan Erdogmus vs Veselin Topalov.

Credit: Frans Peeters