Lichess Chief Operating Officer Theophilus Wait shared his opinion on Chess.com in an interview with Chess with Mustreader. Wait believes that the platform is showing a deterioration in service quality. Theophilus notes that Chess.com is extracting a lot of value from the chess community.
Theophilus Wait
Lichess Chief Operating Officer“[Question: What are your thoughts about Chess.com?]
In what sense?
[Question: For example, when somebody says: ‘Chess.com’, which associations do you have in your mind?]
These days I view them very much just in the same way as Duolingo or some kind of online mobile game. I think historically, they were very passionate about chess and trying to provide tools to kind of grow chess and the knowledge of chess.
These days, I think, especially since they were purchased by General Atlantic and now the move as well with CVC, it feels much more like gamification is kind of the idea behind it.
And overall, we’re perhaps seeing a deterioration, in my opinion, of their services. You know, platform decay, if it’s politely phrasеd. Enshittification, if it’s not so politely phrased.
[Question: I’ve heard this term… What exactly has become worse in your opinion? And what’s the benchmark that you are comparing it with?]
The benchmark is an interesting one. I suppose the benchmark is ultimately what I as a chess enthusiast individually and consumer would feel is kind of acceptable. But then that’s also a little bit biased. Because I know behind the scenes on Lichess, I know the costs of doing things like Puzzles, of Stockfish Analysis, etc.
I think there’s definitely been a move recently in changing the kind of barriers. The paywalls, for example. Previously people were paying a certain amount for 5 or 10 puzzles or whatever. And these paywalls are shifting, and people are getting less, and things are being hidden from the UI that were previously there.
And a lot of these things are very, very cheap. So, it really strikes me as nickel-and-diming a little bit, and generally just trying to maybe continue extracting a lot of wealth or value from the chess community. And these days I’m not certain how much they kind of put into it, if that makes sense.
[Question: So, you believe that it used to be better because the paywalls were not as aggressive and prevalent as they are now?]
It’s an element of it. There was this thing like the Pro Chess League, which was kind of being supported. There are still of course major online events which are being done. But I think we’re seeing these events generally shrink and reduce quite a lot.
Pro Chess League no longer exists. I think the Bullet Championships or whatever — there were some qualifiers which have been reduced as well.
So overall, I have a bit of a hesitation, I suppose, these days in what I view the motivation as. And that’s kind of why I just see them as Duolingo these days.”
Chess platforms Lichess.org and Chess.com introduced changes to their game analysis systems in July. Lichess expanded its functionality, while Chess.com made certain features available only to specific paid subscription tiers.
Chess.com removed Advanced Stats from the Platinum subscription tier. Access to this statistics section became limited to the highest-priced Diamond subscription tier. The previously free Tactics and Strategy sections in the game analysis became available only by subscription.
Game analysis on Lichess, like all other features on the site, has always been and remains free. On Chess.com, several features are only available through a paid monthly subscription. It is divided into three levels: Gold ($4.86/m), Platinum ($7.78/m), and Diamond ($11.67/m). Paid features include puzzles, lessons, bots, AI coaches, game reviews, deep explanations, advanced stats, and more.
Credit: Chess with Mustreader YouTube
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Add your comment
Log in to add a comment.